Why aren't shortcuts as easy as unix links?

 

 

Sent to you by Hudong via Google Reader:

 

 

Why aren't shortcuts as easy as unix links?

via MSDN Blogs by oldnewthing on 10/15/07

Commenter dingo asks, "Why are shortcuts so hard to manipulate? Why can't they be as easy as unix links?"

Well, if you want something like unix links, then you can just create a hard link. Creating them is about the same difficulty (CreateHardLink vs link) and manipulating them is the same since you don't actually manipulate a hard link. You just use it like a regular file (since a regular file is a hard link).

If you want something like unix symbolic links, then you can create an NTFS junction, such as this one that mounts a drive into a directory. (I'm told that Windows Vista expands the repertoire of symbolic links as well.)

But neither of these features is available on FAT (or CD-ROMs or Novell Netware or email), which meant that Windows 95 couldn't use them. Last year I discussed in some detail why shortcuts are files. Maybe that's what your question is really about.

 

 

Things you can do from here:

• Visit the original item
  on MSDN Blogs
• Subscribe to MSDN Blogs using Google Reader
• Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your favorite sites