星期五, 七月 31, 2009
星期三, 七月 29, 2009
专访开胸验肺农民工：与其等死不如赌一把_新闻中心_新浪网
专访开胸验肺农民工：与其等死不如赌一把_新闻中心_新浪网
撤职处分副局长就完了？过两天重新上任？所谓的“专家”为什么不被定罪？为什么不撤查这个“专家”背后的“领导”？
撤职处分副局长就完了？过两天重新上任？所谓的“专家”为什么不被定罪？为什么不撤查这个“专家”背后的“领导”？
星期二, 七月 28, 2009
星期五, 七月 24, 2009
5名律师上书高法称醉酒撞人获死刑量刑过重_新闻中心_新浪网
5名律师上书高法称醉酒撞人获死刑量刑过重_新闻中心_新浪网
醉酒撞车逃逸被判死刑的，不能算一个有责任的人，但是对待是否赔钱，是不是中国人上面，应该一视同仁。
醉酒撞车逃逸被判死刑的，不能算一个有责任的人，但是对待是否赔钱，是不是中国人上面，应该一视同仁。
星期四, 七月 23, 2009
星期三, 七月 22, 2009
Anti-Patterns To Avoid In Entity Framework N-Tier Applications
Anti-Patterns To Avoid In Entity Framework N-Tier Applications
"Anti-Pattern #2: Assuming Static Requirements
Speaking of changes to the system, sometimes you design around an assumption that requirements will remain static, but there are two cases where changing requirements have an especially significant impact. One comes from treating the client as trusted, and the other occurs when the mid-tier service assumes the client will be implemented using a particular technology."
Pattern and decoupling assumes the interface is static and will never change, when overall requirement keeps changing, the database schema could be totally invalid at some point of game, thus the store proc and interfaces are all invalid. that's where you lost all your decoupling benefit and feel more pain about adapting to the new design.
"Anti-Pattern #2: Assuming Static Requirements
Speaking of changes to the system, sometimes you design around an assumption that requirements will remain static, but there are two cases where changing requirements have an especially significant impact. One comes from treating the client as trusted, and the other occurs when the mid-tier service assumes the client will be implemented using a particular technology."
Pattern and decoupling assumes the interface is static and will never change, when overall requirement keeps changing, the database schema could be totally invalid at some point of game, thus the store proc and interfaces are all invalid. that's where you lost all your decoupling benefit and feel more pain about adapting to the new design.
Anti-Patterns To Avoid In Entity Framework N-Tier Applications
Anti-Patterns To Avoid In Entity Framework N-Tier Applications
"Loose coupling is more difficult than tight coupling, and often the performance is not as good. You start off with the best of intentions, but end up asking if the benefit is worth the cost. Why introduce an interface and dependency injection when you could just create an instance of the class and call the method directly? Why build an abstraction with custom objects mapped to the database instead of filling a DataTable and passing it around?
To make matters worse, you do not usually feel the pain of tight coupling until much later. In the short term, you gain some efficiency and get the job done, but in the long run evolving the application can become almost impossible."
In the long run Microsoft already created new object libraries that are not backward compatible and you already jumped on it and rewrote your application. Also when pattern isnt always necessary or could be bad for development and performance, ANTI-PATTERN is good.
"Loose coupling is more difficult than tight coupling, and often the performance is not as good. You start off with the best of intentions, but end up asking if the benefit is worth the cost. Why introduce an interface and dependency injection when you could just create an instance of the class and call the method directly? Why build an abstraction with custom objects mapped to the database instead of filling a DataTable and passing it around?
To make matters worse, you do not usually feel the pain of tight coupling until much later. In the short term, you gain some efficiency and get the job done, but in the long run evolving the application can become almost impossible."
In the long run Microsoft already created new object libraries that are not backward compatible and you already jumped on it and rewrote your application. Also when pattern isnt always necessary or could be bad for development and performance, ANTI-PATTERN is good.
星期五, 七月 17, 2009
关于西藏农奴的英文说法 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
关于西藏农奴的英文说法 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
去年讨论的时候，感觉很多人觉得应该用serf而不是slave。今天看书碰巧看到古罗马
时候serf的出现，提到serf是'between slave and freeman'，个人觉得serf应该是佃
农，因为虽然被迫在田地里面为雇主工作，serf还是自由身，而西藏的农奴不是自由身
，应该叫做slave
Main Entry:
serf Listen to the pronunciation of serf
Pronunciation:
\ˈsərf\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French, from Old French, from Latin servus slave
Date:
1611
: a member of a servile feudal class bound to the land and subject to the
will of its owner
Main Entry:
1slave Listen to the pronunciation of 1slave
Pronunciation:
\ˈslāv\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English sclave, from Anglo-French or Medieval Latin; Anglo-French
esclave, from Medieval Latin sclavus, from Sclavus Slavic; from the
frequent enslavement of Slavs in central Europe during the early Middle Ages
Date:
14th century
1 : a person held in servitude as the chattel of another 2 : one that is
completely subservient to a dominating influence 3 : a device (as the
printer of a computer) that is directly responsive to another
去年讨论的时候，感觉很多人觉得应该用serf而不是slave。今天看书碰巧看到古罗马
时候serf的出现，提到serf是'between slave and freeman'，个人觉得serf应该是佃
农，因为虽然被迫在田地里面为雇主工作，serf还是自由身，而西藏的农奴不是自由身
，应该叫做slave
Main Entry:
serf Listen to the pronunciation of serf
Pronunciation:
\ˈsərf\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French, from Old French, from Latin servus slave
Date:
1611
: a member of a servile feudal class bound to the land and subject to the
will of its owner
Main Entry:
1slave Listen to the pronunciation of 1slave
Pronunciation:
\ˈslāv\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English sclave, from Anglo-French or Medieval Latin; Anglo-French
esclave, from Medieval Latin sclavus, from Sclavus Slavic; from the
frequent enslavement of Slavs in central Europe during the early Middle Ages
Date:
14th century
1 : a person held in servitude as the chattel of another 2 : one that is
completely subservient to a dominating influence 3 : a device (as the
printer of a computer) that is directly responsive to another
星期三, 七月 15, 2009
星期二, 七月 14, 2009
转一段nyt读者的评论，写得不错。 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
转一段nyt读者的评论，写得不错。 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
This situation is complicated, and like most stories, perhaps the truth is
somewhere in between. While each case has its own specific background,
parallels to this incident can be seen in other inter-ethnic conflicts
around the world (Chinese - Malay), Fiji (Fijian - Indian), Indonesia (
Chinese- Indonesian), United States - LA, Watts (Black-White), Spain (Basque
-Spanish)etc. etc
These incidents are all unfortunate, and due to inequalities (real or
perceived) or perhaps by historical rivalries or unexplained racial hatred.
What is clear however, is that when such incidences occur in China, the West
seems to exploit them to push its agenda against the Chinese government,
justifying and excusing the rioters excesses (Uigher or Tibetan).
On the contrary, I don’t think I recall the western media using the LA
riots to indict the US government for its oppression of minorities or
support / ignore some of the thuggery of the rioters against innocent people
, often white (recall truck driver Reginald Denny), in the same way they
gloss over violence against Han Chinese.
Furthermore, lack of ethnic violence or strife in Western countries, is not
an indication of perfect non-discriminatory societies.
In fact it could highlight the fact that the Maori in NZ (Maori up until the
70s were often caned at school for speaking their language), Aboriginal in
Australia (Tasmanian aboriginals were wiped out by the middle of the 20
Century) or North American Indian or Black people in the US, or indigenous
and black people in Brazil have been so disenfranchised due to the genocide
against their culture and language, that they no longer even understand the
notion of independence.
While there are probably genuine grievances in China among certain
minorities, I feel it is incorrect and hypocritical for Western governments
and media to get behind / support any outburst of riotous violence, in order
to take the moral high ground against China. Inter-ethnic violence is a
terrible thing, and should not be used by West (media / government) as a
tool for advancing self-interest.
Furthermore people should have a look in their own backyards before rushing
to judgment on what is happening in their neighbours.
— Mark
Tierney
This situation is complicated, and like most stories, perhaps the truth is
somewhere in between. While each case has its own specific background,
parallels to this incident can be seen in other inter-ethnic conflicts
around the world (Chinese - Malay), Fiji (Fijian - Indian), Indonesia (
Chinese- Indonesian), United States - LA, Watts (Black-White), Spain (Basque
-Spanish)etc. etc
These incidents are all unfortunate, and due to inequalities (real or
perceived) or perhaps by historical rivalries or unexplained racial hatred.
What is clear however, is that when such incidences occur in China, the West
seems to exploit them to push its agenda against the Chinese government,
justifying and excusing the rioters excesses (Uigher or Tibetan).
On the contrary, I don’t think I recall the western media using the LA
riots to indict the US government for its oppression of minorities or
support / ignore some of the thuggery of the rioters against innocent people
, often white (recall truck driver Reginald Denny), in the same way they
gloss over violence against Han Chinese.
Furthermore, lack of ethnic violence or strife in Western countries, is not
an indication of perfect non-discriminatory societies.
In fact it could highlight the fact that the Maori in NZ (Maori up until the
70s were often caned at school for speaking their language), Aboriginal in
Australia (Tasmanian aboriginals were wiped out by the middle of the 20
Century) or North American Indian or Black people in the US, or indigenous
and black people in Brazil have been so disenfranchised due to the genocide
against their culture and language, that they no longer even understand the
notion of independence.
While there are probably genuine grievances in China among certain
minorities, I feel it is incorrect and hypocritical for Western governments
and media to get behind / support any outburst of riotous violence, in order
to take the moral high ground against China. Inter-ethnic violence is a
terrible thing, and should not be used by West (media / government) as a
tool for advancing self-interest.
Furthermore people should have a look in their own backyards before rushing
to judgment on what is happening in their neighbours.
— Mark
Tierney
大家看看这个NED的科普版本如何？ - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
大家看看这个NED的科普版本如何？ - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
NED科普
版上经常出现NED这个词语，对于常混本版的ID，都略有了解，许多新手往往不清楚NED
是什么。这个帖子略作一科普。
NED，全称National Endowment for Democracy，中文为：国家民主基金会，网址: http://www.ned.org。
该组织自称私人、非盈利性组织(链接：http://www.ned.org/about/about.html)，而实际上是美国国会下属的机构。其活动经费每年由美国国会直接审批。
NED创立的原因：
由于美国法律和国际上一些国际公约、国际法的限制，美国中央情报局不能公开从事一
些推翻他国政府或者宣战、暗杀等活动。于是，NED就以私人、非盈利机构的形式出现
，可以不受国际法限制和约束的从事一些推翻他国政府的活动。
NED的活动：
近年来，中亚各国的颜色革命(捷克斯洛伐克的天鹅绒革命，格鲁吉亚的玫瑰革命，乌
克兰的栗子花革命，伊拉克的紫色革命，黎巴嫩的雪松革命，吉尔吉斯斯坦的郁金香革
命，缅甸的反军政府运动又称为番红花革命/袈裟红革命，伊朗的绿色革命)背后都可见
该组织的身影。
NED针对中国的活动：
NED针对中国资助的个人或组织有以下几类：藏独、疆独、法轮功、海外的各类民运组
织、国内的所谓的政治异议人士、香港的所谓民主派。
以下数据仅仅是公开的数据。不公开的数据就没有人清楚了。
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%A8%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E5%9F%BA%E9%87%91%E6%9C%83
2007年，NED针对中国相关的独轮运组织共拨款611万0531美元。其中
香港 36万9983美元，
西藏 44万4710美元，
新疆 52万1105美元，
其他地区 477万4733美元。
2008年，NED针对中国相关的组织共拨款607万0174美元（不含海外民运和法轮功数据)
。其中，
http://www.ned.org/grants/08programs/grants-asia08.html#China
大陆地区：479万2716美元(西藏新疆单独统计，不含在此数字内)
香港：35万5423美元
西藏：35万1930美元
新疆：57万0105美元。
海外的民运和法轮功数据未知。
本版上所说的拿NED funding的，就是指一些从NED接受资助、专门在网上散布反华、分
裂中国言论的独轮运。由于NED的数据只是按照国家排列，没有列出海外民运或者法轮
功的数据。所以，有部分ID以此为借口否认NED资助的网上发帖的独轮运的存在。
NED科普
版上经常出现NED这个词语，对于常混本版的ID，都略有了解，许多新手往往不清楚NED
是什么。这个帖子略作一科普。
NED，全称National Endowment for Democracy，中文为：国家民主基金会，网址: http://www.ned.org。
该组织自称私人、非盈利性组织(链接：http://www.ned.org/about/about.html)，而实际上是美国国会下属的机构。其活动经费每年由美国国会直接审批。
NED创立的原因：
由于美国法律和国际上一些国际公约、国际法的限制，美国中央情报局不能公开从事一
些推翻他国政府或者宣战、暗杀等活动。于是，NED就以私人、非盈利机构的形式出现
，可以不受国际法限制和约束的从事一些推翻他国政府的活动。
NED的活动：
近年来，中亚各国的颜色革命(捷克斯洛伐克的天鹅绒革命，格鲁吉亚的玫瑰革命，乌
克兰的栗子花革命，伊拉克的紫色革命，黎巴嫩的雪松革命，吉尔吉斯斯坦的郁金香革
命，缅甸的反军政府运动又称为番红花革命/袈裟红革命，伊朗的绿色革命)背后都可见
该组织的身影。
NED针对中国的活动：
NED针对中国资助的个人或组织有以下几类：藏独、疆独、法轮功、海外的各类民运组
织、国内的所谓的政治异议人士、香港的所谓民主派。
以下数据仅仅是公开的数据。不公开的数据就没有人清楚了。
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%A8%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E5%9F%BA%E9%87%91%E6%9C%83
2007年，NED针对中国相关的独轮运组织共拨款611万0531美元。其中
香港 36万9983美元，
西藏 44万4710美元，
新疆 52万1105美元，
其他地区 477万4733美元。
2008年，NED针对中国相关的组织共拨款607万0174美元（不含海外民运和法轮功数据)
。其中，
http://www.ned.org/grants/08programs/grants-asia08.html#China
大陆地区：479万2716美元(西藏新疆单独统计，不含在此数字内)
香港：35万5423美元
西藏：35万1930美元
新疆：57万0105美元。
海外的民运和法轮功数据未知。
本版上所说的拿NED funding的，就是指一些从NED接受资助、专门在网上散布反华、分
裂中国言论的独轮运。由于NED的数据只是按照国家排列，没有列出海外民运或者法轮
功的数据。所以，有部分ID以此为借口否认NED资助的网上发帖的独轮运的存在。
太牛了，希望大家广为转贴 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
太牛了，希望大家广为转贴 - 未名空间(mitbbs.com)
Comment from markinnj on Jul 9th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
http://web.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=military&MsgID=578070
I just finished watching an interview with Ms Rebiya Kadeer and found a few
interesting facts:
1. She had 11 children, which confirms that Uighurs were not subject to
China's One Child Policy.
2. She was born to a family with no background. She started her business
with a road side convenient store and worked her way to be THE richest
person in the province of Xinjing. This proved Uighurs can earn their
business success through hard work.
3. She was a senior member of the People's Congress of Xinjing, and a senior
member of the National People's Congress of China. This shows Uighurs were
not excluded from political life in China.
4. She was arrested because she provided funding to Eastern Turkestan and
carried out activities in China following instructions from Eastern
Turkestan. Eastern Turkestan is labeled as terrorist organization by most
countries including the US, Russia, China, etc.
Comment from markinnj on Jul 9th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
http://web.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=military&MsgID=578070
I just finished watching an interview with Ms Rebiya Kadeer and found a few
interesting facts:
1. She had 11 children, which confirms that Uighurs were not subject to
China's One Child Policy.
2. She was born to a family with no background. She started her business
with a road side convenient store and worked her way to be THE richest
person in the province of Xinjing. This proved Uighurs can earn their
business success through hard work.
3. She was a senior member of the People's Congress of Xinjing, and a senior
member of the National People's Congress of China. This shows Uighurs were
not excluded from political life in China.
4. She was arrested because she provided funding to Eastern Turkestan and
carried out activities in China following instructions from Eastern
Turkestan. Eastern Turkestan is labeled as terrorist organization by most
countries including the US, Russia, China, etc.
星期六, 七月 11, 2009
星期三, 七月 08, 2009
苏振华：中国油价低于美国是指鹿为马_新闻中心_新浪网
苏振华：中国油价低于美国是指鹿为马_新闻中心_新浪网
3.99 * 3.78500 Chinese yuan = 2.21041108 U.S. dollars
也不算很离谱啊，美国汽油也加工业酒精ethanol的。
3.99 * 3.78500 Chinese yuan = 2.21041108 U.S. dollars
也不算很离谱啊，美国汽油也加工业酒精ethanol的。
星期四, 七月 02, 2009
The definition of 1 + 1 = 2
We all know it, it's not a theory that needs to be proven, it's not something that can be modified, that's way it is. The point is, that's the same with 'marriage', where a man and woman creates a family and might create children. That's what the definition of marriage has been.
LGBT are trying to change this definition and they claim other people cant vote on this? Why not? This impacts everybody, not just benefit them, it could harm the children too!
If we were to change the definition of 1 + 1 = 2(real marriage) to include 1 + 2 = 2(gay marriage), what about 1 + 3 = 2(multigamy?) or 1 + n = 2?(what ever)? That's discrimination.
We all know it, it's not a theory that needs to be proven, it's not something that can be modified, that's way it is. The point is, that's the same with 'marriage', where a man and woman creates a family and might create children. That's what the definition of marriage has been.
LGBT are trying to change this definition and they claim other people cant vote on this? Why not? This impacts everybody, not just benefit them, it could harm the children too!
If we were to change the definition of 1 + 1 = 2(real marriage) to include 1 + 2 = 2(gay marriage), what about 1 + 3 = 2(multigamy?) or 1 + n = 2?(what ever)? That's discrimination.