星期一, 一月 31, 2011
星期四, 一月 27, 2011
Fact Checking Rep. Bachmann's "Tea Party Response" To The State Of The Union | Political Correction
Fact Checking Rep. Bachmann's "Tea Party Response" To The State Of The Union | Political Correction
[show/hide]
Insisting that she was not upstaging the official GOP response to President Obama's State of the Union, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) offered a combative and highly misleading speech of her own following the president's address. In her "Tea Party Response," Bachmann repeated a litany of false right-wing talking points about everything from the Recovery Act and job losses to the debt and "16,500 IRS agents."
Bachmann: "Failed Stimulus," And Unemployment "Spiked"
BACHMANN: Unfortunately, the President's strategy for recovery was to spend a trillion dollars on a failed stimulus program, fueled by borrowed money.[...] Not only did that plan fail to deliver, but within three months the national jobless rate spiked to 9.4 percent. And sadly, it hasn't been lower for 20 straight months. While the government grew, we lost more than 2 million jobs. Let me show you a chart. Here are unemployment rates over the past ten years. In October 2001, our national unemployment rate was at 5.3 percent. In 2008 it was at 6.6 percent. But, just eight months after President Obama promised lower unemployment, that rate spiked to a staggering 10.1 percent.
Unemployment Didn't "Spike" — It Grew Steadily Under Bush-Era Policies...
The Economy Shed Almost 8 Million Jobs Under Republican Policies Before The Recovery Act Could Affect The Economy. According to economist Robert J. Shapiro:
From December 2007 to July 2009 - the last year of the Bush second term and the first six months of the Obama presidency, before his policies could affect the economy - private sector employment crashed from 115,574,000 jobs to 107,778,000 jobs. Employment continued to fall, however, for the next six months, reaching a low of 107,107,000 jobs in December of 2009. So, out of 8,467,000 private sector jobs lost in this dismal cycle, 7,796,000 of those jobs or 92 percent were lost on the Republicans' watch or under the sway of their policies. Some 671,000 additional jobs were lost as the stimulus and other moves by the administration kicked in, but 630,000 jobs then came back in the following six months. The tally, to date: Mr. Obama can be held accountable for the net loss of 41,000 jobs (671,000 - 630,000), while the Republicans should be held responsible for the net losses of 7,796,000 jobs. [Sonecon.com, 8/10/10, emphasis added]
Based on Shapiro's research, the Washington Post's Ezra Klein created the following chart showing net job losses before and after the Recovery Act was enacted:
星期三, 一月 26, 2011
Text of GOP’s State of the Union response - MarketWatch
Text of GOP’s State of the Union response - MarketWatch
[show/hide]
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Following is the full text of the Republican response to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech, to be given by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.
Good evening. I’m Congressman Paul Ryan from Janesville, Wisconsin – and Chairman here at the House Budget Committee.
President Obama just addressed a Congressional chamber filled with many new faces. One face we did not see tonight was that of our friend and colleague, Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona. We all miss Gabby and her cheerful spirit; and we are praying for her return to the House Chamber.
Earlier this month, President Obama spoke movingly at a memorial event for the six people who died on that violent morning in Tucson. Still, there are no words that can lift the sorrow that now engulfs the families and friends of the fallen.
What we can do is assure them that the nation is praying for them; that, in the words of the Psalmist, the Lord heals the broken hearted and binds up their wounds; and that over time grace will replace grief.
*****
As Gabby continues to make encouraging progress, we must keep her and the others in our thoughts as we attend to the work now before us.
Tonight, the President focused a lot of attention on our economy in general – and on our deficit and debt in particular.
He was right to do so, and some of his words were reassuring. As Chairman of the House Budget Committee, I assure you that we want to work with the President to restrain federal spending.
In one of our first acts in the new majority, House Republicans voted to cut Congress’s own budget. And just today, the House voted to restore the spending discipline that Washington sorely needs.
The reason is simple.
A few years ago, reducing spending was important. Today, it’s imperative. Here’s why.
We face a crushing burden of debt. The debt will soon eclipse our entire economy, and grow to catastrophic levels in the years ahead.
On this current path, when my three children – who are now 6, 7, and 8 years old – are raising their own children, the Federal government will double in size, and so will the taxes they pay.
No economy can sustain such high levels of debt and taxation. The next generation will inherit a stagnant economy and a diminished country.
Frankly, it’s one of my greatest concerns as a parent – and I know many of you feel the same way.
*****
Our debt is the product of acts by many presidents and many Congresses over many years. No one person or party is responsible for it.
There is no doubt the President came into office facing a severe fiscal and economic situation.
Unfortunately, instead of restoring the fundamentals of economic growth, he engaged in a stimulus spending spree that not only failed to deliver on its promise to create jobs, but also plunged us even deeper into debt.
The facts are clear: Since taking office, President Obama has signed into law spending increases of nearly 25% for domestic government agencies – an 84% increase when you include the failed stimulus.
All of this new government spending was sold as “investment.” Yet after two years, the unemployment rate remains above 9% and government has added over $3 trillion to our debt.
Then the President and his party made matters even worse, by creating a new open-ended health care entitlement.
What we already know about the President’s health care law is this: Costs are going up, premiums are rising, and millions of people will lose the coverage they currently have. Job creation is being stifled by all of its taxes, penalties, mandates and fees.
Businesses and unions from around the country are asking the Obama Administration for waivers from the mandates. Washington should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. The President mentioned the need for regulatory reform to ease the burden on American businesses. We agree – and we think his health care law would be a great place to start.
Last week, House Republicans voted for a full repeal of this law, as we pledged to do, and we will work to replace it with fiscally responsible, patient-centered reforms that actually reduce costs and expand coverage.
Health care spending is driving the explosive growth of our debt. And the President’s law is accelerating our country toward bankruptcy.
Our debt is out of control. What was a fiscal challenge is now a fiscal crisis.
We cannot deny it; instead we must, as Americans, confront it responsibly.
*****
And that is exactly what Republicans pledge to do.
Americans are skeptical of both political parties, and that skepticism is justified – especially when it comes to spending. So hold all of us accountable.
In this very room, the House will produce, debate, and advance a budget. Last year – in an unprecedented failure– Congress chose not to pass, or even propose a budget. The spending spree continued unchecked.
*****
Text of Obama’s State of the Union speech - MarketWatch
Text of Obama’s State of the Union speech - MarketWatch
[show/hide]
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Following is the full text of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech, as released by the White House.
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:
Tonight I want to begin by congratulating the men and women of the 112th Congress, as well as your new Speaker, John Boehner. And as we mark this occasion, we are also mindful of the empty chair in this Chamber, and pray for the health of our colleague – and our friend – Gabby Giffords.
It’s no secret that those of us here tonight have had our differences over the last two years. The debates have been contentious; we have fought fiercely for our beliefs. And that’s a good thing. That’s what a robust democracy demands. That’s what helps set us apart as a nation.
But there’s a reason the tragedy in Tucson gave us pause. Amid all the noise and passions and rancor of our public debate, Tucson reminded us that no matter who we are or where we come from, each of us is a part of something greater – something more consequential than party or political preference.
We are part of the American family. We believe that in a country where every race and faith and point of view can be found, we are still bound together as one people; that we share common hopes and a common creed; that the dreams of a little girl in Tucson are not so different than those of our own children, and that they all deserve the chance to be fulfilled.
That, too, is what sets us apart as a nation.
Now, by itself, this simple recognition won’t usher in a new era of cooperation. What comes of this moment is up to us. What comes of this moment will be determined not by whether we can sit together tonight, but whether we can work together tomorrow.
I believe we can. I believe we must. That’s what the people who sent us here expect of us. With their votes, they’ve determined that governing will now be a shared responsibility between parties. New laws will only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. We will move forward together, or not at all – for the challenges we face are bigger than party, and bigger than politics.
At stake right now is not who wins the next election – after all, we just had an election. At stake is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else. It’s whether the hard work and industry of our people is rewarded. It’s whether we sustain the leadership that has made America not just a place on a map, but a light to the world.
We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.
But we have never measured progress by these yardsticks alone. We measure progress by the success of our people. By the jobs they can find and the quality of life those jobs offer. By the prospects of a small business owner who dreams of turning a good idea into a thriving enterprise. By the opportunities for a better life that we pass on to our children.
That’s the project the American people want us to work on. Together.
We did that in December. Thanks to the tax cuts we passed, Americans’ paychecks are a little bigger today. Every business can write off the full cost of the new investments they make this year. These steps, taken by Democrats and Republicans, will grow the economy and add to the more than one million private sector jobs created last year.
But we have more work to do. The steps we’ve taken over the last two years may have broken the back of this recession – but to win the future, we’ll need to take on challenges that have been decades in the making.
Many people watching tonight can probably remember a time when finding a good job meant showing up at a nearby factory or a business downtown. You didn’t always need a degree, and your competition was pretty much limited to your neighbors. If you worked hard, chances are you’d have a job for life, with a decent paycheck, good benefits, and the occasional promotion. Maybe you’d even have the pride of seeing your kids work at the same company.
That world has changed. And for many, the change has been painful. I’ve seen it in the shuttered windows of once booming factories, and the vacant storefronts of once busy Main Streets. I’ve heard it in the frustrations of Americans who’ve seen their paychecks dwindle or their jobs disappear – proud men and women who feel like the rules have been changed in the middle of the game.
They’re right. The rules have changed. In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business. Steel mills that once needed 1,000 workers can now do the same work with 100. Today, just about any company can set up shop, hire workers, and sell their products wherever there’s an internet connection.
Meanwhile, nations like China and India realized that with some changes of their own, they could compete in this new world. And so they started educating their children earlier and longer, with greater emphasis on math and science. They’re investing in research and new technologies. Just recently, China became home to the world’s largest private solar research facility, and the world’s fastest computer.
So yes, the world has changed. The competition for jobs is real. But this shouldn’t discourage us. It should challenge us. Remember – for all the hits we’ve taken these last few years, for all the naysayers predicting our decline, America still has the largest, most prosperous economy in the world. No workers are more productive than ours. No country has more successful companies, or grants more patents to inventors and entrepreneurs. We are home to the world’s best colleges and universities, where more students come to study than any other place on Earth.
What’s more, we are the first nation to be founded for the sake of an idea – the idea that each of us deserves the chance to shape our own destiny. That is why centuries of pioneers and immigrants have risked everything to come here. It’s why our students don’t just memorize equations, but answer questions like “What do you think of that idea? What would you change about the world? What do you want to be when you grow up?”
The future is ours to win. But to get there, we can’t just stand still. As Robert Kennedy told us, “The future is not a gift. It is an achievement.” Sustaining the American Dream has never been about standing pat. It has required each generation to sacrifice, and struggle, and meet the demands of a new age.
Now it’s our turn. We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world. We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business. We need to take responsibility for our deficit, and reform our government. That’s how our people will prosper. That’s how we’ll win the future. And tonight, I’d like to talk about how we get there.
The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation.
None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be, or where the new jobs will come from. Thirty years ago, we couldn’t know that something called the Internet would lead to an economic revolution. What we can do – what America does better than anyone – is spark the creativity and imagination of our people. We are the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook. In America, innovation doesn’t just change our lives. It’s how we make a living.
Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation. But because it’s not always profitable for companies to invest in basic research, throughout history our government has provided cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support that they need. That’s what planted the seeds for the Internet. That’s what helped make possible things like computer chips and GPS.
Just think of all the good jobs – from manufacturing to retail – that have come from those breakthroughs.
Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik¸ we had no idea how we’d beat them to the moon. The science wasn’t there yet. NASA didn’t even exist. But after investing in better research and education, we didn’t just surpass the Soviets; we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.
This is our generation’s Sputnik moment. Two years ago, I said that we needed to reach a level of research and development we haven’t seen since the height of the Space Race. In a few weeks, I will be sending a budget to Congress that helps us meet that goal. We’ll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology – an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people.
Already, we are seeing the promise of renewable energy. Robert and Gary Allen are brothers who run a small Michigan roofing company. After September 11th, they volunteered their best roofers to help repair the Pentagon. But half of their factory went unused, and the recession hit them hard.
Today, with the help of a government loan, that empty space is being used to manufacture solar shingles that are being sold all across the country. In Robert’s words, “We reinvented ourselves.”
That’s what Americans have done for over two hundred years: reinvented ourselves. And to spur on more success stories like the Allen Brothers, we’ve begun to reinvent our energy policy. We’re not just handing out money. We’re issuing a challenge. We’re telling America’s scientists and engineers that if they assemble teams of the best minds in their fields, and focus on the hardest problems in clean energy, we’ll fund the Apollo Projects of our time.
At the California Institute of Technology, they’re developing a way to turn sunlight and water into fuel for our cars. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, they’re using supercomputers to get a lot more power out of our nuclear facilities. With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.
We need to get behind this innovation. And to help pay for it, I’m asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but they’re doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday’s energy, let’s invest in tomorrow’s.
Now, clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market for what they’re selling. So tonight, I challenge you to join me in setting a new goal: by 2035, 80% of America’s electricity will come from clean energy sources. Some folks want wind and solar. Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas. To meet this goal, we will need them all – and I urge Democrats and Republicans to work together to make it happen.
Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America’s success. But if we want to win the future – if we want innovation to produce jobs in America and not overseas – then we also have to win the race to educate our kids.
Think about it. Over the next ten years, nearly half of all new jobs will require education that goes beyond a high school degree. And yet, as many as a quarter of our students aren’t even finishing high school. The quality of our math and science education lags behind many other nations. America has fallen to 9th in the proportion of young people with a college degree. And so the question is whether all of us – as citizens, and as parents – are willing to do what’s necessary to give every child a chance to succeed.
That responsibility begins not in our classrooms, but in our homes and communities. It’s family that first instills the love of learning in a child. Only parents can make sure the TV is turned off and homework gets done. We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair; that success is not a function of fame or PR, but of hard work and discipline.
Our schools share this responsibility. When a child walks into a classroom, it should be a place of high expectations and high performance. But too many schools don’t meet this test. That’s why instead of just pouring money into a system that’s not working, we launched a competition called Race to the Top. To all fifty states, we said, “If you show us the most innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement, we’ll show you the money.”
Race to the Top is the most meaningful reform of our public schools in a generation. For less than one percent of what we spend on education each year, it has led over 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning. These standards were developed, not by Washington, but by Republican and Democratic governors throughout the country. And Race to the Top should be the approach we follow this year as we replace No Child Left Behind with a law that is more flexible and focused on what’s best for our kids.
You see, we know what’s possible for our children when reform isn’t just a top-down mandate, but the work of local teachers and principals; school boards and communities.
Take a school like Bruce Randolph in Denver. Three years ago, it was rated one of the worst schools in Colorado; located on turf between two rival gangs. But last May, 97% of the seniors received their diploma. Most will be the first in their family to go to college. And after the first year of the school’s transformation, the principal who made it possible wiped away tears when a student said “Thank you, Mrs. Waters, for showing… that we are smart and we can make it.”
Let’s also remember that after parents, the biggest impact on a child’s success comes from the man or woman at the front of the classroom. In South Korea, teachers are known as “nation builders.” Here in America, it’s time we treated the people who educate our children with the same level of respect. We want to reward good teachers and stop making excuses for bad ones. And over the next ten years, with so many Baby Boomers retiring from our classrooms, we want to prepare 100,000 new teachers in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math.
In fact, to every young person listening tonight who’s contemplating their career choice: If you want to make a difference in the life of our nation; if you want to make a difference in the life of a child – become a teacher. Your country needs you.
Of course, the education race doesn’t end with a high school diploma. To compete, higher education must be within reach of every American. That’s why we’ve ended the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that went to banks, and used the savings to make college affordable for millions of students. And this year, I ask Congress to go further, and make permanent our tuition tax credit – worth $10,000 for four years of college.
Because people need to be able to train for new jobs and careers in today’s fast-changing economy, we are also revitalizing America’s community colleges. Last month, I saw the promise of these schools at Forsyth Tech in North Carolina. Many of the students there used to work in the surrounding factories that have since left town. One mother of two, a woman named Kathy Proctor, had worked in the furniture industry since she was 18 years old. And she told me she’s earning her degree in biotechnology now, at 55 years old, not just because the furniture jobs are gone, but because she wants to inspire her children to pursue their dreams too. As Kathy said, “I hope it tells them to never give up.”
If we take these steps – if we raise expectations for every child, and give them the best possible chance at an education, from the day they’re born until the last job they take – we will reach the goal I set two years ago: by the end of the decade, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.
One last point about education. Today, there are hundreds of thousands of students excelling in our schools who are not American citizens. Some are the children of undocumented workers, who had nothing to do with the actions of their parents. They grew up as Americans and pledge allegiance to our flag, and yet live every day with the threat of deportation. Others come here from abroad to study in our colleges and universities. But as soon as they obtain advanced degrees, we send them back home to compete against us. It makes no sense.
Now, I strongly believe that we should take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration. I am prepared to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, enforce our laws and address the millions of undocumented workers who are now living in the shadows. I know that debate will be difficult and take time. But tonight, let’s agree to make that effort. And let’s stop expelling talented, responsible young people who can staff our research labs, start new businesses, and further enrich this nation.
The third step in winning the future is rebuilding America. To attract new businesses to our shores, we need the fastest, most reliable ways to move people, goods, and information – from high-speed rail to high-speed internet.
Our infrastructure used to be the best – but our lead has slipped. South Korean homes now have greater internet access than we do. Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in their roads and railways than we do. China is building faster trains and newer airports. Meanwhile, when our own engineers graded our nation’s infrastructure, they gave us a “D.”
We have to do better. America is the nation that built the transcontinental railroad, brought electricity to rural communities, and constructed the interstate highway system. The jobs created by these projects didn’t just come from laying down tracks or pavement. They came from businesses that opened near a town’s new train station or the new off-ramp.
Over the last two years, we have begun rebuilding for the 21st century, a project that has meant thousands of good jobs for the hard-hit construction industry. Tonight, I’m proposing that we redouble these efforts.
We will put more Americans to work repairing crumbling roads and bridges. We will make sure this is fully paid for, attract private investment, and pick projects based on what’s best for the economy, not politicians.
Within 25 years, our goal is to give 80% of Americans access to high-speed rail, which could allow you go places in half the time it takes to travel by car. For some trips, it will be faster than flying – without the pat-down. As we speak, routes in California and the Midwest are already underway.
星期二, 一月 25, 2011
星期一, 一月 24, 2011
星期六, 一月 22, 2011
星期四, 一月 20, 2011
评论:中美关系再提速
"中美要做伙伴而非对手,已成为双方的主流民意。"
一厢情愿的宣传,美国的各种主流媒体,FOX/NPR/CNN/CBS/NBC这些对中国仍然非常敌对,经常进行攻击,一边攻击中国,还喜欢攻击中国对美国不够友好。
"中美要做伙伴而非对手,已成为双方的主流民意。"
一厢情愿的宣传,美国的各种主流媒体,FOX/NPR/CNN/CBS/NBC这些对中国仍然非常敌对,经常进行攻击,一边攻击中国,还喜欢攻击中国对美国不够友好。
星期三, 一月 19, 2011
JJS.at : Software Projects : PSPdisp
JJS.at : Software Projects : PSPdisp
http://forums.psp-hacks.com/f120/signed-homebrews-for-ofw-t271271/
"This program package enables the use of a PlayStation Portable as an additional monitor in Windows. You can also remotely send keyboard and mouse commands to the PC. The newest version implements sound streaming, too."
"PSPdisp is compromised of four components, on Windows a display driver, an usb driver and the interface application which captures the screen, compresses it and sends it over USB or WLAN to the PSP. On the PSP side there is an application that decompresses the frames and displays them."
PSPdisp v0.5.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?j0fco7bpysjd478
http://forums.psp-hacks.com/f120/signed-homebrews-for-ofw-t271271/
"This program package enables the use of a PlayStation Portable as an additional monitor in Windows. You can also remotely send keyboard and mouse commands to the PC. The newest version implements sound streaming, too."
"PSPdisp is compromised of four components, on Windows a display driver, an usb driver and the interface application which captures the screen, compresses it and sends it over USB or WLAN to the PSP. On the PSP side there is an application that decompresses the frames and displays them."
PSPdisp v0.5.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?j0fco7bpysjd478
海龟日记 --清华海归副教授的苦辣酸甜
[show/hide]
ZZ 海龟日记 --清华海归副教授的苦辣酸甜
虹桥科教论坛 http://www.rainbowplan.org/bbs/edu/
送交者: rotten 于 2009-11-13 07:54:49
ZZ 海龟日记 --清华海归副教授的苦辣酸甜 2009-11-02 12:35 | (分类:默认分类)原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (1) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-28 13:41:16
原打算将这个故事分成五章,拟定的标题是(一)出国;(二)学习生活;(三)快乐科研;(四)海龟日子;(五)归去来兮.故事原本应该循序渐进,慢慢展开才好,特别是第二章和第三章,希望给大家讲述海外留学生们奋斗的苦辣酸甜,这也为第四章的故事作一些铺垫.但今天上来又看了版面上一些关于海龟教授的讨论,心如乱麻,无法平静下来,因此决定宁可牺牲故事的连贯性,也要先把这章对我来说比较沉重的故事写出来.以后有机会,有心情会再慢慢补充上二三章的内容,让故事读起来更加完整一些.
============== 华丽的正文分割线 ==================
西河九年7月15日
"不错,院里老师对你刚才陈述的研究计划非常满意,你的背景这么强,我想学校这边不会有什么问题,不过可能直接给教授比较难,副教授怎么样,你考虑一下".邓老师很客气的给我递过来一瓶矿泉水,微笑着跟我说.
邓老师的学术水平在国内是数一数二的,因此院里让他专门负责学术评定工作.以前在本科的时候我上过他的课,因此也不是很见外,不客气地接过水,喝了一口.
"谢谢您的帮助,我知道机会难得,我回去后会认真考虑."
"你多想想还有什么困难么?"
"哦,我现在能想到的就是听说西京的房价很贵,你知道我孩子比较多,不知道学校能不能帮忙解决我的房子问题,就是能否分给我三卧室的?"
"嗯,这个应该不是问题,你的情况比较特殊,我知道学校有空房,就是可能房子老了一些。不过,好像现在国家政策不让学校分房,大概会是租借的方式。"
“租金?”我最关心的就是这个。
“按一平米三块钱算,现在系里年轻教授都是这样的”。
紫荆花的校园中的快乐时光始终无法从我的记忆中抹去,时间愈久则愈加思念。正因为此,回母校任教成为我寻求回国发展的第一选择甚至是唯一选择。仿佛只要我再次踏入这熟悉的土地,那么一切烦恼即可片刻间烟消云散,这种感觉之强烈,已经足以左右我对实际情况的冷静分析判断。
一回到旅店,我内心中已经开始憧憬我在母校任教的光明未来,自言自语算计着:
“我的能力肯定没问题,在学术上应该能会很快stand out”,说起来,我有这方面的自信。如果你看我的简历你会发现,只用四年时间就获得了美国top five大学的博士学位,博士毕业后在世界最负盛名的大学进行研究工作有近五个年头,亦今为止,已经发表了25篇SCI索引的科学论文,其中颇有些高质量影响力大的文章,最高的一片引用数已经达到100次以上,也有给美国某公司做兼职科学顾问的经历,种种这些成功经历足以证明自己的科研水平与能力。
“还有,我在这也有一定的人脉基础。毕竟是从这里毕业的,与很多教授早已相识,甚至于很多年青教授原本就是师兄弟,这方面自己肯定不是劣势。”
“母校的学生资源丰富,这点不能忽视”,作了这么多年研究,也辅助带过博士生,我当然知道一名好学生对科研的重要意义。
“嗯,生活上可能会清苦一些,不过再怎么着,毕竟是副教授了,总不至于连自己的家都养活不起吧,只要房子解决了,其他的开销肯定不会很大。再说,苦就苦个一两年也就过去了,工作展开了就不用怕了。我也不是那种不能吃苦的人。”
“吃饭可以吃学校食堂,孩子带不过来可以很方便地请父母帮忙,或者大不了请保姆,这些事情在美国是做不到的了。更为重要的,父母鬓角已斑白,自己终于可以不用与父母只能隔着太平洋通话了。”
“我喜欢站在讲台上滔滔不绝的感觉。嗯,我的第一课,可以给同学讲讲自己在美国求学和工作的故事。。。”
西河九年11月12日
收到系里老师的电子邮件,学校那边的审核都已经没问题,正式聘任书在附件中,需要做出决定的时刻到了。
再次发信给系里老师,确认房子问题,得到的答复是“学校已同意分配给你三室一厅的房子”,于是,心头石头落地。
LP让我自己决定,不管我到哪里她会跟着我。
当断则断,不再犹豫,决定做个海龟。
与系里商量过后,考虑到每年三月中旬是国家自然基金申请的期限,最好在那之前回去,不会错过基金申请。于是定在次年2月中旬回国。LP则会继续留在美国.毕竟拖家带口施在不方便,最好等我安顿好了再举家回迁.还有一个更重要的原因是,刚刚得知LP又怀孕了,当然更不好轻举妄动.
西河十年2月23日
西京的二月份凉意还很足。”我,胡汉山,又回来了.”自己随身带了五千美元以备不时之需.
西河十年2月24日
一安顿下来就马不停蹄的办理各种手续.没想到的事,第一天就在学校人事科碰到了大钉子.
“你的学位没有得到教育部的认证,按学校规定暂时不能给你发工作证”
“我让院里的老师们出证明行么?他们比教育部对我的情况更加了解.”
“哦,前两天计算机系有一个也是你这个情况,耐心等待一下,认证很快的.先例一开很麻烦,希望多多理解”
“房子呢”
“房子要房产科管”
因为没有工作证,房子当然不能现在分.
下午,自己按图索驹找到了教育部留学人员服务中心,填表,自己学位证书原件,中国驻美国大使馆开具的留学证明,等等一并交了上去.
一天过去,一点小的挫折而已,这难不倒我.
我只是不能理解,系里招教授难道对所招的人员最基本的学术背景都不了解么?如果了解,那么为什么对招来的教授的学位还需要教育部来认证?如果不了解,这个认证的过程难道不是应该学校出面才对的么,怎么是被招收人员需要自己寻求认证呢?
我努力的让自己不要想得太多,但是那种受侮辱感觉还是不时的冒出来,让我非常不自在,自己在回国的第一天就感受到了那种人与人之间的不信任.我告诫自己,这是国情,可能我在外面太久了.
原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (2) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-28 15:15:53
西河十年3月14日
明天是上交自然基金申请得最后期限了,辛苦了两个星期,总算完成计划书。
我现在才发现自己真是幼稚到了无敌的地步了。竟然回来以后才知道,原来国内大学里的副教授是没有资格单独带博士生的,这对我来说真的是个不小的打击。美国大学里的Associate professor虽然中文翻译过来是副教授,但实质的内容竟是天地之别。“母校的学生资源丰富”对我这样的副教授来说不过就是那空中楼阁,看起来很美,如梦如幻。
如果是光杆司令的话,这个经费可能就很难申请了。还好,我的“人脉”在此时发挥了重要的作用。有两个大教授表示会拨他们的学生给我,让我一起带。
毕竟是第一次申请基金不知深浅,还是保守一些比较好。正好自己年龄小,于是我申请了相对容易的青年教师基金,虽然金额不算大,但慢慢来么,刚开始的时候,还是争取一次性成功最重要。
不过,递交基金申请书又遇到了麻烦。因为我的学位还处于被教育部耐心认证着的过程中,于是到目前为止我实际上还是海带状态,于是我们没有身份,于是我根本不满足申请基金的条件,于是学校科研科的同志们不能将我的基金申请书交到基金委。于是,我这两个星期来的努力具有了极大的一江春水向东流的危险性。不过,这是有惊无险的一次。科研科的老师们比较好说话,在系里出具了证明及保证书的情况下,我的基金申请被学校顺利递交上去了。
我体会到了温暖。
西河十年4月15日
昨天心情不错。
自从基金申请书递上去之后,因为没有身份,系里工作无法开展,于是难得的比较清闲。正好回国前做的一些研究工作还没有整理,于是利用这段时间又写了一篇文章,今天刚好修改完毕。
突然意识到,学位认证已经一个月了,怎么结果还没有下来。刚好系里一位德高望重的老教授来询问我的情况,我把这个事情跟他说了一下。他二话不说,拿起电话就给学校人事科拨了过去。
“你们怎么回事儿,我们系里新招的XX副教授怎么一个月了还没拿到认证。。。”老先生明显有点发火了。
下午收到人事科老师打过来的电话,“噢,刚刚给教育部留学人员服务中心通电话,你那个学位认证可以明天去取了,以后有困难要直接跟我们说,不要。。。”
我苦笑着听他把话说完。我自己这一阶段几乎每个星期跑一次学校的人事科,不过每次的答复都没有不同,“先例不可开”。
今天又跑了一趟留学生服务中心,一切都很顺利。
“你是uuuu学校的?很好的学校,top five吧?”
得到别人的肯定总是一件让人高兴的事情。我的情绪又有点high了。
西河十年4月25日
这些天一直跑来跑去办理各项工作手续。工作证也有了,电子信箱有了,科研用的电脑也有了。今天终于可以有机会去揭开房子的神秘面纱了。去房产科,很顺利,有两间房子任我挑。系里的老师陪我去参谋了一下,我选定一处离系楼比较近的,购物也方便。总算有了自己的住处。
副教授的工资不会太多,刚开始可能一个月近四千吧,不过我算一下,七十多平米的房子按每平米三块钱算,一个月也就二百多块钱的房租,还能剩三千多块呢,觉得够用了。不用去费心算计了,工资完全是按职称来的,到底多少,一个月后就知道了。
不过后来发生的事情却远远超出我的想象之外。
【原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (3) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-28 16:28:24
西河十年5月9日
今天是教学预讲的日子,只有通过了预讲才有资格在下学习开始给学生授课。系里在教学方面比较看重我,给我安排的是教授属于国家精品课程的一门基础课。我一直很喜欢这门课,他的应用性很强,很和我的胃口。我不喜欢那些太国枯燥,将公式反复推来推去的课程。
五一长假期间,我一直在为预讲精心地准备着。系里非常有教学经验的老师已经将他们的PPT文件给我做了备份。我选择了与自己研究关联最密,最利于自己发挥一章内容,为了扩大学生的知识面,增加他们的学习兴趣,我还特别新加入了一些相关领域最新研究成果的介绍。
父母知道我忙,从家乡坐火车来西京看我。我非常过意不去,没有很多时间陪他们。
不用说,预讲非常成功,所有的听课老师给的评定等级都是最高级,我的辛苦没有白费。
分配的自己的房子已经多年没有人住,此时自己请的装修师傅正在对其厕所和厨房进行必要的改造,我总觉得小房间里如果厕所和厨房弄清爽了,那整个屋子也就清爽了,因此特别注意让他们帮我把这两个屋子好好弄一下。装修师傅是系里介绍的,比较可靠,我也就不担心,可以完全放手交给他去弄了。
西河十年5月23日
房子装修好了,崭新的一样,我挺满意。师傅说一共要花一万零八百块钱,不过最后我把钱如数交给他的时候,他只收了我一万块钱。
至此,我在还没拿到一分钱的工资的情况下,自己倒是从自己腰包贴补了几万块钱。还好自己带些钱过来。
西河十年6月2日
今天是发工资的日子,所有的谜底终于就要揭晓了。
我小心翼翼地打开工资单,映入眼帘的是一个让我震惊的数字,让我想破了脑筋也想不到的数字:2。07元,是的我没有看错,小数点也没有点错。我第一个想法就是,这不可能是真的!一定是哪里出了问题。
将隔壁的副教授也是我的铁哥们抓来帮我分析工资单哪里出错了。
“噢,是有点错,不过正确的数字不是两块多钱,而应该是负五百多块钱!”
“不会吧,不是说四千么?”
“我这个也不是特清楚,看起来你得跟我差别主要在这两项“。
我顺着他手指的方向看过去。
“你看,你本月应得工资大概是两千八百块钱,然后你应付给学校房费是三千四百二十块钱,另外你的工龄为零,这与我的不同。”
"为什么我的工龄是零?"
"哦,好像是这样。如果你像我这样在国内念的博士,那么工龄是从本科毕业开始算的,现在我有10年工龄。而你是在国外年的博士,又一直在国外工作,因此你工龄是从回国才开始算而不是从本科毕业,因此也就是零了,不过这部分钱很少”
我就感觉脑袋唰的一下,整个世界都清静了。原来单从工资上来看,海龟们在他回国的那一刻起,海外的经历可以瞬间清零。我的自信在那一刻消失的无影无踪。
“房价怎么回事儿?跟我以前知道的不一样啊?还有,你的也只有一百多块钱啊。"
“哦,这个你去问一下王老师,她应该知道”
王老师很热情地接待了我。“你帮我看看我的工资单,怎么会是这个奇怪的数字?还有房费是不太高了?”我问道,到现在还是觉得一定什么地方出错了。
“啊,这个我知道了,没有错。学校从今年初政策调整了,所有教师如果租用学校的房子需要按当地市场价,因此你的房子是按每平方米四十五元钱算的。”
她随手拿过了计算器,“嗯,你的房子是76平方米,算一下正好三千四百二十块钱。”
“你刚开始的基本工资是两千八百块钱,我估计学校没法再扣了,所以给你账面上留下了二块钱。”
“那为什么别的教授房价只有一百多块钱呢?”
“因为这个政策只适用于今年以后入校的教师”。
“那我是去年十一月份就答应回校的啊,而且也没有人告诉我政策变了啊”
“哎,国内的事儿。不过,这让人怎么过啊,你快去找找校领导吧。”
我顿时大脑短路,不知所措
【原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (4) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-29 08:11:17
西河十年6月3日
火车提速以后,出行真是方便。昨天晚上从西京上的火车,今天一大早就到昌口了,不过这一夜很难熬,想到自己工资待遇问题还不知道能不能顺利得到解决,一夜无眠。
这次出行是早就定下了,是应901所的邀请来做个学术报告,自己以前在美国时候科研方向正好是他们研究所的研究方向重合。
迎接我的是小赵,一表人才。说起来他算是我的学弟,他是前年从我们系硕士毕业后到这里工作的,据说当时学校很重视,还给他的情况登了校报加以介绍,鼓励毕业生毕业后多选择去与国防有关的科研所工作。
自己做过的东西以前也讲过很多遍了,不过这次来之前还是准备了很长时间。因为毕竟自己搞的是基础研究,901所他们可能更关心应用价值吧。我的报告取得非常好的效果,几个特地跑过来跟我说,我讲了好些很新很基础的东西对他们很有用。几乎所有相关科室的研究人员都来参加报告,我的判断也没有错,与他们一起讨论了很多在实际设计中遇到的问题,自己收获也很大。
中午,小赵所在科室的领导为我准备了丰盛的午餐。
“我们所正打算培养小赵,准备让他在职念个博士,想聘任您做他的导师,小赵很上进。。。”领导询问道。
“我也很希望能把自己的研究与实际的应用结合起来,如果小赵愿意跟我做些研究,这对我来说正是求之不得的好事啊。不过,我现在是副教授,还没有资格带博士生。”
“噢,你们学校给你定的什么职位跟我们没关系,我们就觉得你做小赵的导师最合适,如果同意我们马上可以下聘书。”
那一刻我有点感动,甚至产生了不行就留在901所干的冲动。
傍晚时分,研究所领导让小赵给我送行,并嘱咐他一定带我去吃当地的特产小吃。我非常喜欢小赵,他的求知欲旺盛,让我想起了当年的自己。
回来的火车上,又是一个不眠夜。我想了很多很多。当想起父母五一过来的时候自己都没有陪他们去西京的景区逛一逛,那一刻我泪流满面。我突然意识到,自己回来三个多月了,竟然一直忙得没来得及回家看一看父母,而西京到故乡坐快速列车只需要4个小时。仔细算来,三月份申请基金,写文章;四月份在学校办手续,中间去浙大做学术交流;五月份,准备预讲,装修房子,中途去西安出差;六月份无论如何也要回家一趟了。我当初选择海龟,与家人团聚是很重要的一个因素,回来以后竟然把这个忽视了。
西河十年6月4日
工资的问题必须忙上搞清楚,否则我无法安心工作。今天一回到办公室,秘书李老师就跑过来。
“快,快,X老师,陈老师刚好来,现在在我那屋,他以前是副校长,你把你的情况跟他说说,没准他能帮上忙”。
我三步并做两步跑到秘书室,看到陈老师正在那与另外了老师谈事情。等他们谈完后,李老师跟他大概介绍了一下我的情况。
“不对,不对,你的工资不对,二千八好像不对,我去找学校帮你查一查,下午给你电话。”他好像很有把握。
看来我还有希望。
最后终于真相大白了。原来我还应该有一千二百块钱的房子补助学校没有给我发,陈老师说学校以后会把房补发给我。原来我以前所知道的四千块钱工资没有错。
但是当我再次计算我能拿到手的工资的时候,我发现我的实际情况并没有改善多少。我所有的工资加起来四千块钱,去掉交还给学校的房子租金三千四百二十块钱,那么我每个月的生活费终于可以高达五百八十块钱了。
我真不知道自己该喜还是该忧。
原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (5) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-29 14:28:03
西河十年6月5日
已经三天了,睡眠一直成问题。昨天原本早早就上床,睡是睡着了,不过半夜三点钟就醒来,然后就又开始不由自主地胡思乱想。我还是不敢相信,如果所有的副教授都像我这样的待遇,每个月到手就五百多块钱,那么他们靠什么生活呢?
一大早跑到办公室,就看到隔壁的副教授已经来了。
“阿华,这么早”。“阿华”是比我早一年的同校师兄。西河四年的时候,他博士毕业去我们group做过博士后,我那时候正是博士最后一年。私下里关系一直不错,彼此故作暧昧地称对方为阿什么,显得亲切,这个习惯到现在也没变。
“没法子,今天上午有门课。昨天给所里打了一天的杂,没来得及备,上课前先搂两眼,准备一下”
“打什么杂?”
“不是国家重点实验室验收又要开始了么,帮忙整理些材料。你那事儿怎么样了?”
“学校少发我一千二房补,这么算我到手工资应该五百多块钱。。。”
李老师路过这里,打了声招呼。“X老师,昨天怎么样?陈老师帮你把问题解决了么”李老师很热心,一直以来为我的事儿跑前跑后没少帮忙。
我把情况跟她说了一下,开始诉苦,讲了这几个月来的各种委屈,说着说着情绪有点失控。
“您呀,还是放宽心吧,可别把身体搞垮了”。
李老师走后,师兄的脸色也有点难看。
“阿宇,你的事情,我昨天跟虹一说,我们都很难受。”虹是阿华的爱人,大家一直很熟。
“学校太不像话了,挣钱也没这么挣的。以前租金比较低还好,好歹你我有个安身之地。我现在那四十平米的两室,自己一个孩儿,一家人挤一挤,将就过了,也无所谓了。可是你的情况学校知道,再怎么着也该照顾一下啊。我看学校想捞钱想疯了。你那三室的房子,用老政策需要自己交给学校二百多块钱,用新政策要交三千四百多块钱,学校反给你一千二百块钱,可是一项差价就是进2000块钱啊,我们都副教授了,才挣多钱啊。你知道么,虹是在XX公司做文秘的,他到手的工资每月五千多,是我的两倍。苦啊。”
“正想问你,科研经费提成怎么算?我回国前,好像听说可以从科研经费里拿提成,填补家用。”
“噢,前年开始政策变了,别说你没赶上,我都没赶上”师兄比我早两年回到系里,因此他这么说。
“What?!”我皱了皱眉头。在我内心中一直以为只要搞到足够多的科研经费就可以腐败了呢。
“跟你说吧,现在是纵向经费不能提成,横向经费才可以提成。以前是都可以的。”
“纵向经费?横向经费?”
“不懂了吧。纵向经费就是走正规渠道申请来的经费,国家自然基金了,各种重点项目了,什么的。横向经费是从公司或工厂里搞来的。”
“consulting fee?”我马上意识到,横向经费应该是相当于美国大学教授或科研人员给公司做顾问收取的报酬。
“差不多,就是那个意思。"
"这么说,以后大学教授们需要多做consulting的活才能让日子好过点?这。。。科研?”
我那时候不知道该说什么好。我在美国是给公司做过consulting的,我做consulting的钱也是可以名正言顺地直接进我自己腰包的,只要不通过学校,甚至连overhead都没有,只需要交税。有些老教授也会偶尔接一些consulting的活,有的时候一些简单的问题也会让学生帮忙做一些,不过如果让学生做的话,是明确会告诉对方公司,然后对方公司会按学生的rate付钱。这些不是什么不能公开的秘密。
但是问题在于,教授们大多不喜欢做consulting的活,因为耽误不起那时间,对自己的科研帮助并不大。
师兄接过我的话茬。“是啊。问题就在这里啊。像你我这样的,年纪轻毕竟天天想着搞科研搞科研,写文章啊写文章,早日升教授啊早日升教授,打破脑袋也想着自己把基金项目申请下来,然后希望能分到好点的学生,把自己的科研网下做下去,这些都无疑要靠纵向经费。就算你申请了横向经费,文章不能写,科研价值不高,嗯,也不能把话说绝了,有些活还是能挖掘写东西出来的。不过自己舍得时间做吗?好不容易有了学生,也不好意思让他们去做,那不是给学生耽误了么?”
“这么说想一门心思靠科研的话只能过清苦日子了?”
“你看我二千多块钱,也没时间腐败,够用了。时间长乐,总会找到些办法的。”
“什么办法?”
“你看我请客吃饭啊,出门打车车费总是可以想办法报销的。我自己没有横向经费,但刘老师有,我有时候会跟他换经费用。实际上就是我让他帮我报一些车费,然后他买仪器的时候,我用我的纵向经费帮他付。也就这样了吧。”
我沉默了好一会儿。我内心中只有感概。却也越发觉得自己五百块钱工资的问题是非解决不可了的。否则,五百块钱在西京无论如何是活不下去的。而我以后将面临着为了填补家用而不得不努力申请“横向经费”,我的雄心壮志或许会被慢慢消磨,而自己的一切关于科研的梦想将也会慢慢模糊,这些现在看来已经是可以预见的到的了。
“想起来了,学校有个校长信箱,你不妨给校长写封信,把你的情况说明一下。我觉得他们给你按去年的政策办是顺理成章的啊,你不是属于去年被招进来的么。”
“对,我去写信。”我别无选择。
我从来没有想过钱的问题,对于我来说,钱是够用就行,也总觉得自己牛的不行,永远不会发愁钱,但现在我不得不承认,自己错了。
【原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (6) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-30 08:33:01
西河十年6月8日
给校长写的信完成了。信的内容大体上,先吹嘘了一下自己可以用来吹嘘的光荣历史,多少文章了,多少学术报告了。除此还专门提到,一位美国院士为我给系里写的推荐信中,称我为“他所合作过得最优秀的博士后”。他的推荐信是单独寄出,回来后所长给我看了我才知道的,而这封信几乎成为对我学术能力评价最有说服力的证据之一,在院里为我申请学校位置,评定职称的时候也是专门拿出来的,这是自己引以为豪的事情,应该让领导们知道。我也特别强调自己对母校割舍不下的感情是促使自己回母校任教的很重要原因。然后讲到的是,自己在短短3个多月来所遇到的种种困难,诚恳地说出,这些遭遇对于我这样一个本科毕业就出国深造,根本没有一点社会经验的海外学子是很难应付,但不管怎样始终如一的对工作抱着极大的热情,并且已经有一些成绩出来。比如说,帮助系里恢复网页功能了,已经向SCI索引的期刊提交了一篇学术论文了,积极参加学术交流了,自己的成果获得国防科研院的认可了,参加预讲评级为优,总之就是不厌其烦地把那些自己觉得能体现自己踏实工作的鸡毛蒜皮的小事都像领导汇报了一下,不外乎希望能让领导知道我是真心愿意为母校发展尽力,愿意为母校早日成为世界一流学校这一宏伟目标而尽自己的微薄之力,而信写到这里,我已经不仅仅是把自己当作是一位普通的大学教师,也是一位一直关注母校发展的校友了。
这封信写了又改,改了又写,让其他老师帮忙看了改了,主要是怕写得太生硬,显的态度不诚恳。今天早上,所长也读了我的信,并在信后附上了他的意见,所说属实,代表所里表达希望学校能对我的事情特设特办,给与关照的意愿。
所长帮我把校长的信交给人事科的老师请他们有机会转交给校长或者书记,然后他忧心忡忡地跟我聊了起来。说起来,当年我就是所长推荐出国的,当然那时候他还不是所长。
“XX,你回国前没考虑别的学校么?”
“没有,我一门心思想回母校,母校培养我这么多年,希望能回报一下。”
“我能理解。哎,现在学校的条件越来越差了,对系里的经费卡的也越来越紧,我们所里的工作都没法展开。难办啊。原本在我这个位置有些话不该说,可是你的情况,哎,回来的时机不好。学生啊,经费啊,这些我能帮你会想法帮你,可是学校有些政策,我们也真是无能为力。不过,刚开始起步时后肯定困难多多,慢慢会好起来的,你要相信这点。”
他停顿了一下。
“嗯,国内有些事情不好说。XX,你也不用太担心,如果实在不行,你的房费我想办法从我自己一些经费帮你出,没准是可以按访问学者算的。”
“郝老师,我回国您帮我不少了,我非常感谢您。不管怎样我还是希望学校把我房子的问题解决,按以前政策办,否则我就会觉得学校太没诚意了,那样自己的心会凉,工作干的也真就没多大意思了。”
“好吧,有困难跟我说,别轻易放弃。”
“我知道”。
跟所长谈完话,我却愈发觉得事情或许并不是像我开始想象得那么简单,但问题能解决的信心仍然没失。
西河十年6月10日
一直以来,过着家与办公室两点一线的生活,近乎与外界封闭。今天突然注意到楼门外张贴着求租房屋的广告,我很好奇,凑上前去。
“为方便孩子上学,求租本小区房屋,租金面谈,可以考虑比市价略高,有意者请联系王先生,手机123454675”
一个念头突然在我脑海中产生,“没准我可以把房子租出去?然后再找别的地方住?”不过,这个荒谬无比的想法一瞬间就在我脑海中消失的无影无踪。我能去哪里找便宜的房子呢?看现在的势头,恐怕不得不去密云了。回国前,我还和LP以前憧憬过,以后住在校园里,可以每天晚上吃完晚饭,一起去荷塘散步,春日里是满园的迎春花,丁香扑鼻;夏日里可以听那蛙鸣,看那树影婆娑;秋日里欣赏那落叶满地金;冬日里欣赏那大雪压枝头,甚至我们高兴了,可以去图书馆一起并肩坐一段时间,想必我们一定可以重温大学里那月上柳梢头,人约黄昏后的美好时光吧。
不过“可以把房子租出去”这个想法却总是在自己脑海中挥之不去,为了证实他的可行性,我甚至天真到专门回家翻了与学校的租房和约。
【原创】海龟日记(四)海龟日子 (7) [ 不爱吱声 ] 于:2009-10-30 11:38:09
西河十年6月14日
今天下午收到书记打过来的电话。
“今天校党委书记来院里来视察工作,我们院专门把你的情况介绍了一下,书记当场指派负责房产的副校长把你的事情处理一下,应该近期会给你一个答复的。”
这可真是个好消息,我想我可以稍稍放宽心了。
晚上跟所长,阿华还有学生们开过了小组会,已经是晚10点钟。也不仅仅是今天,这几个月以来,几乎每天我们两个都会工作到11点钟以后,实际上系里很多年青教师都如此,这也是没办法的事情,白天杂事儿太多,只能靠晚上的时间来做些研究,在工作的刻苦程度这一点上,这些国内年轻教师们与国外那些在tenure track压力下工作的年教授们几乎没什么两样。所长也回自己的办公室继续工作。
阿华和我则又聊了起来。
“听说,学校书记亲自过问你的事儿了”
“是啊,现在是书记老大么?我忘了我们那时候书记是谁了,只记得校长是XXX院士。”
“我可是名优秀的党员,说话要讲证据。”阿华故作严肃地教训我。接着说:“今天我又被学生打击了。”
“听着新鲜啊,快讲讲。”
“学生给我提意见,说我每星期给他们留三道题任务太艰巨,让我给他们减压,还威胁我。什么事儿呀。”
“威胁你?!”
“你还没开始给学生上课,不了解。现在的学生一个个很牛的,不像我们那时候那么老实了。他们可不好得罪,学校对教师教学工作的评定只是根据学生给教师的打分情况来判定的,稍不留神,你被搞了个底分影响就大了,这个可不是没有先例。方强(副教授)去年因为考试题出的难了点,12项被学生打了11项底分,哎,即便以后他科研干得再好,评教授时候总是个事儿。”
“如果考试题出难了,学生没考好,那基本上一定是教授教得不好。现在的学风可不如从前,你去看看晚上图书馆上自习的人数就知道了。现在宿舍里都有电脑,与其上自习还不如在宿舍里炼级呢。哦,对了,副教授还要做几年本科生辅导员,这个不用急,明年就会轮到你的。”
“那也应该尊重教授啊”这个是我问的。
“哎,别说学生了。现在教授社会地位哪里还像从前了。社会上一提教授,不是剽窃别人的文章了,要么就是贪污科研经费了,能有几个啊,个别现象被无限放大,好像教授就没好人了似的。反正黑锅大家一起背吧。”
“别光说我的事儿,你跟LP汇报情况了么?”
“还没有,她怀孕快到预产期了,我怕他太担心。”
“马上要回去了吧,我觉得你也该回去轻松轻松了,看你现在天天无精打采的样子。哪天走?”
“6月27号的票,往返票,8月15日回来。然后去新疆开完会,就开学了吧。”
“行李多么,到时候我去送你”
西河十年6月25日
现在西京的地铁四通八达,真是方便。从宿舍楼出来,骑车也就三分钟路程,就可以到达轻轨站口,进地铁后,到处是奥运的标语,站内非常整洁干净,到北京站不用再受路上堵车之苦了。原来的七道口,白棋营等著名景点早已不见踪影。校园东门外商楼林立,气度非凡.这块属于学校的商机无限的风水宝地,房租以天价来形容决不为过,但这根本挡不住财大气粗的中外大公司来此安营扎寨,开拓事业,骨哥,收狗等著名公司的招牌熠熠闪光,向过往人们展示着经济的繁荣。
今天是母亲从家乡过来,想让她跟我一起回美国帮帮忙。火车站到还是往昔的景象,来来往往各色人等行色匆匆。我独自一人焦急地等待母亲的到来。
“你总是心太软心太软独自一个人流泪到天亮。。。”
这是我的手机铃声音乐。不要笑,我喜欢老歌还不行么。
一看,电话是从学院书记那里打过来的,一定是跟我的房子有关,我毫不迟疑翻开机盖儿。
“小X,你那事儿学校帮你解决的,是副校长亲自办的。”
听到这句话,我心里挺高兴的,觉得学校还是通情达理的。
“学校已经同意,用系里准备拨给你的设备费报销你自己每月的房租。那笔费用五万足够负担一两年的了。副校长还专门跑到校财会那里,把那笔经费。。。”
我当时真的有点发懵,这绝对是我无论如何也想不到的事情,怎么结果会是这个?
“我买电脑向郝老师借了一些钱,原本是打算那笔经费一到手就还郝老师的,学校能不能把我的房租按原来的政策。。。”
“哎呀,经费的事情以后可以想办法,学校政策不好说改就改,特别是这个政策刚开始实施。小X,不要太较真,副校长专门跑你这件事儿不容易,。。。”
“好的。。。”我说了些客套话,合上了手机。
虽然学校的关于房租的新政策不可以说改就改,但基金的分配的使用政策确是可以说改就改的。在我看来,这绝对是舍本求末的做法。“失望”二字刻在我的心底。这是我心目中最好的大学,在追求国际一流大学的过程中,高层领导处理问题却与学校目标背道而驰。这极大地打击了自己脆弱的神经,对自己以及对学校未来的期许产生了深深的怀疑。
将母亲接回到家中安顿好,又回到办公室。
阿华冲了进来。“我知道学校的处理结果了.”
“这绝对是我们自己想都想不到的最坏结果了,再怎么着学校也不能一毛不拔,让你把自己左边兜里的钱放到右边兜啊.我就不明白,同样是学校的海龟,大师学校就可以专门盖别墅给他们住,小鱼小虾就连住公寓都这么难。学校为什么就没有志气培养出自己的大师来呢?急功近利!”看出来,他的怨气不低于我。
“估计你也不会再赖着不走了。我TMD也不想干了”
如果说这个世界上有压倒骆驼的最后一根稻草的话,那么学校对困扰我多日的房租问题的这个处理结果就是那一根稻草了。这一刻,我终于幡然醒悟,与其执著,不如归去。
网民拍下被拐卖男童乞讨照片 家人追踪两年未果_新闻中心_新浪网
网民拍下被拐卖男童乞讨照片 家人追踪两年未果_新闻中心_新浪网
早就应该立法禁止任何形式使用儿童卖艺/乞讨,如果发现警方/城管应该迅速将儿童收容!
早就应该立法禁止任何形式使用儿童卖艺/乞讨,如果发现警方/城管应该迅速将儿童收容!
星期一, 一月 17, 2011
Error passing a large variable as a parameter to a remote method
Error passing a large variable as a parameter to a remote method
System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException: The input stream is not a valid binary format. The starting contents (in bytes) are: 53-79-73-74-65-6D-2E-57-65-62-2E-48-74-74-70-45-78 ... Server stack trace: at System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.SerializationHeaderRecord.Read(__BinaryParser input)... etc.
The largest byte array I can successfully pass across the wire is 4,193,890 elements in size, as soon as I go to 4,193,891 it bombs out with the above exception.
4193891/1024 is approximately 4096
4096 is the default maxRequestLength for an ASP.NET request to a server. this is the most probable cause...
you can change this behavior in your config file.
useFullyQualifiedRedirectUrl="true|false"
enable = "true|false"
idleTime = "minutes"
maxRequestLength="size in kbytes"
executionTimeout="seconds"
minFreeThreads="number of threads"
minFreeLocalRequestFreeThreads="number of threads"
appRequestQueueLimit="number of requests"
enableVersionHeader="true/false"/>
see http://whidbey.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dv_aspnetgenref/html/e9b81350-8aaf-47cc-9843-5f7d0c59f369.asp
also,
Large Data Strategies
http://whidbey.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnservice/html/service11072001.asp
Uploading Files Using the File Field Control
http://whidbey.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnet-fileupload.asp
a search on maxRequestLength yields a handful of others.
System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException: The input stream is not a valid binary format. The starting contents (in bytes) are: 53-79-73-74-65-6D-2E-57-65-62-2E-48-74-74-70-45-78 ... Server stack trace: at System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.SerializationHeaderRecord.Read(__BinaryParser input)... etc.
The largest byte array I can successfully pass across the wire is 4,193,890 elements in size, as soon as I go to 4,193,891 it bombs out with the above exception.
4193891/1024 is approximately 4096
4096 is the default maxRequestLength for an ASP.NET request to a server. this is the most probable cause...
you can change this behavior in your config file.
enable = "true|false"
idleTime = "minutes"
maxRequestLength="size in kbytes"
executionTimeout="seconds"
minFreeThreads="number of threads"
minFreeLocalRequestFreeThreads="number of threads"
appRequestQueueLimit="number of requests"
enableVersionHeader="true/false"/>
see http://whidbey.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dv_aspnetgenref/html/e9b81350-8aaf-47cc-9843-5f7d0c59f369.asp
also,
Large Data Strategies
http://whidbey.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnservice/html/service11072001.asp
Uploading Files Using the File Field Control
http://whidbey.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnet-fileupload.asp
a search on maxRequestLength yields a handful of others.
星期五, 一月 14, 2011
Delete Firefox auto-complete entries
Delete Firefox auto-complete entries
Just start to type in into the form field until the grey dropdown appears, then use the cursor keys to move to the entry to be deleted and press the SHIFT key and the delete key. Voila!
Just start to type in into the form field until the grey dropdown appears, then use the cursor keys to move to the entry to be deleted and press the SHIFT key and the delete key. Voila!
星期三, 一月 12, 2011
星期二, 一月 11, 2011
星期一, 一月 10, 2011
星期日, 一月 09, 2011
星期六, 一月 08, 2011
星期五, 一月 07, 2011
星期二, 一月 04, 2011
公务员举报领导被关精神病院续:家属索赔64万_新闻中心_新浪网
公务员举报领导被关精神病院续:家属索赔64万_新闻中心_新浪网
仅仅索赔?让纳税人买单?所谓“领导”犯下的严重刑事案件,怎么可以不被公诉?
仅仅索赔?让纳税人买单?所谓“领导”犯下的严重刑事案件,怎么可以不被公诉?
Disease suspected in mass kill of 100K fish in Arkansas River -
Disease suspected in mass kill of 100K fish in Arkansas River -
100k fish, 5k birds... Dumb experts said those birds hit something but clearly those dead birds were scattered all over...
100k fish, 5k birds... Dumb experts said those birds hit something but clearly those dead birds were scattered all over...